Impact of the Covid-19 epidemic on a US sample of patients with myasthenia gravis.

Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic has devastated the world and demonstrated the inadequacy of health care in the United States. To assess its impact, the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network conducted a survey to assess the pandemic on the rare disease community of patients, including those with myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was designed to target people or their care givers who live in the United States, have a rare disease, and are under 90 years of age. Respondents logged onto a dedicated web page and completed the survey online, which requested demographic, disease-specific, drug treatment, and symptom information as well as assessment of Covid-19 impact on them. The survey was open from May 2020 to December 2020. Results: Five hundred ninety-four with self-reported myasthenia gravis completed the survey, which was the largest number of respondents. Sixty percent of respondents were women with a mean age of 60 years. Eighty-nine percent identified as White. Respondents did not appreciate a worsening of symptoms after the pandemic. Only 7 respondents reported the diagnosis of Covid-19 but 11% indicated they had difficulty accessing care at the time of the survey. Discussion and Conclusion: Patients with MG complained of worse access to medical care during the early months of the pandemic, including challenges in diagnosis of suspected Covid-19 infection. A major limitation of the survey is its inability to access minority populations. Nevertheless, the results of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RCDRN) survey of patients with MG provide clear evidence that the pandemic has demonstrated the deficiencies in US healthcare.

Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Deeper understanding of the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic on people with rare diseases is critically important in order to enhance health care in the future. The Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) performed a web-based survey of individuals with rare diseases in the first year of the pandemic utilizing questions to assess the impact of the pandemic on their symptoms, access to healthcare, and medication use. Five hundred and ninety-four respondents reported having myasthenia gravis (MG). The average age was 60 years and 60% were women. Nearly ninety percent were White. A large minority indicated difficulty accessing health care and nearly a third used telemedicine. Only seven respondents indicated a diagnosis of Covid-19 but many more had symptoms consistent with infection. Overall, there was no increase in symptoms of MG after the beginning of the pandemic. The pandemic has demonstrated the deficiencies in US healthcare, and these are appreciated in the results of the RCDRN survey of patients with MG. The RDCRN will continue to survey the rare disease community to understand the ongoing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Safety and efficacy of zilucoplan in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating rare disease, often accompanied by high treatment burden and with an unmet need for more efficacious and well tolerated treatments. Zilucoplan is a subcutaneous, self-administered macrocyclic peptide complement C5 inhibitor. We aimed to assess safety, efficacy, and tolerability of zilucoplan in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR)-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. METHODS: RAISE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 75 sites in Europe, Japan, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged 18-74 years) with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America disease class II-IV), a myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score of least 6, and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg once daily by self-injection, or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in MG-ADL score in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dosing MG-ADL score). Safety was mainly assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients who had received at least one dose of zilucoplan or placebo. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04115293. An open-label extension study is ongoing (NCT04225871). FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2019, and Sept 10, 2021, 239 patients were screened for the study, of whom 174 (73%) were eligible. 86 (49%) patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg and 88 (51%) were assigned to placebo. Patients assigned to zilucoplan showed a greater reduction in MG-ADL score from baseline to week 12, compared with those assigned to placebo (least squares mean change -4·39 [95% CI -5·28 to -3·50] vs -2·30 [-3·17 to -1·43]; least squares mean difference -2·09 [-3·24 to -0·95]; p=0·0004). TEAEs occurred in 66 (77%) patients in the zilucoplan group and in 62 (70%) patients in the placebo group. The most common TEAE was injection-site bruising (n=14 [16%] in the zilucoplan group and n=8 [9%] in the placebo group). Incidences of serious TEAEs and serious infections were similar in both groups. One patient died in each group; neither death (COVID-19 [zilucoplan] and cerebral haemorrhage [placebo]) was considered related to the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Zilucoplan treatment showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis-specific efficacy outcomes, had a favourable safety profile, and was well tolerated, with no major safety findings. Zilucoplan is a new potential treatment option for a broad population of patients with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. The long-term safety and efficacy of zilucoplan is being assessed in an ongoing open-label extension study. FUNDING: UCB Pharma.

Advances and ongoing research in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorders.

Myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome are antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases of the neuromuscular junction that usually present with weakness in ocular muscles and in proximal muscles of the limb and trunk. Prognosis regarding muscle strength, functional abilities, quality of life, and survival is generally good. However, some patients do not respond to treatment. Symptomatic drugs, corticosteroids, and steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs remain the cornerstone of treatment. In the past few years, new biological agents against complement, the FcRn receptor, or B-cell antigens have been tested in clinical trials. These new therapies extend the possibilities for targeted immunotherapies and promise exciting new options with a relatively rapid mode of action. Challenges in their use might occur, with barriers due to an increase in cost of care and additional considerations in the choice of drugs, and potential consequences of infection and vaccination due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Telemedicine visits in myasthenia gravis: Expert guidance and the Myasthenia Gravis Core Exam (MG-CE).

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Telemedicine may be particularly well-suited for myasthenia gravis (MG) due to the disorder's need for specialized care, its hallmark fluctuating muscle weakness, and the potential for increased risk of virus exposure among patients with MG during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during in-person clinical visits. A disease-specific telemedicine physical examination to reflect myasthenic weakness does not currently exist. METHODS: This paper outlines step-by-step guidance on the fundamentals of a telemedicine assessment for MG. The Myasthenia Gravis Core Exam (MG-CE) is introduced as a MG-specific, telemedicine, physical examination, which contains eight components (ptosis, diplopia, facial strength, bulbar strength, dysarthria, single breath count, arm strength, and sit to stand) and takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. RESULTS: Pre-visit preparation, remote ascertainment of patient-reported outcome scales and visit documentation are also addressed. DISCUSSION: Additional knowledge gaps in telemedicine specific to MG care are identified for future investigation.